Leave a Comment | Posted by Larry Ickes on July 29, 2010
‘NO,’ SAID A NEW YORK JUDGE. HE SAID THAT WEARING THE BAGGY DRAWERS IS NOT A CRIME, JUST “VERY FOOLISH.”
That how His Honor ruled in throwing out a summons issued to a man wearing the low, low-slung pants that exposed his skivvies.
JUDGE RUBEN FRANCO SAID THAT THE SUMMONS APPEARED TO BE AN ATTEMPT BY A POLICE OFFICER TO SHOW HIS DISPLEASURE WITH THE STYLE.
I think the baggy jeans have to be the worst fashion statement since…..well….panty hose.
I HAVE A TEEN AGED FRIEND-WHO WEARS JEANS WITH A REAR THAT ALMOST TOUCHES THE GROUND. I TOLD HIM THAT IN ALMOST ALL SURVEYS ASKING WOMEN WHAT THEY FIND ATTRACTIVE IN A MAN, A GUYS’ BUTT IS NEAR THE TOP. (He didn’t seem impressed). I SAID: “JON, YOU DON’T LOOK LIKE YOU EVEN HAVE A BEHIND. IT’S ALL SAGGY PANTS.”
I told him I would pay for a pair of “skinny jeans” if he gave up the baggies. Even that didn’t do it. And he’s 18. At what age do teenagers give up those things?
REMEMBER THE OLDER GUY THAT EVEN WROTE A PARODY ABOUT THEM: “YOUR PANTS ON THE GROUND?” He was on “American Idol.”
Well, as the judge said in his decision: “Many may find the low-slung trouser trend distasteful & foolish.” But he says people can dress how they want as long as they “do not offend public order & decency.” In other words, keep your undies undercover.





